Can I reproduce a web page in my magazine for the purpose of reviewing the site?

15/06/2008

You will not infringe copyright by reproducing material for the purposes of criticism or review, provided this is your real purpose, your use is fair, and you give “sufficient acknowledgment” of each work that you reproduce (for example, each image and each piece of text).

 

“Sufficient acknowledgment” means identifying the work by its title or description and – unless the author is anonymous, uses a pseudonym (pen name) or does not want to be identified – identifying the creator (for example, the writer of the text or the designer of the graphics).

Back to top | Permalink

Do I need permission to use clip art images in a document I am creating?

28.05.2009

You should check whether the licence agreement which came with the clipart software (or appeared on the website from which you downloaded the clipart) allows you to use the art in the ways you want. If you are uncertain whether you are allowed to use the material in your document, you should check with the distributor or copyright owner.

Back to top | Permalink

Do we need permission to use clip art in our publication?

1.6.2008

Clip art is available from software companies and websites. Before using any clip art, you should read the “Terms and Conditions” carefully, as the licences limit the ways in which the clip art may be used. If there is a statement that says the uses of the clip art are limited to private, non-commercial uses, then you should seek permission before incorporating clip art into anything you are creating for commercial purposes.

 

You should also note that a person cannot give you a valid licence to use clip art unless they own the rights, or have obtained the permission of the copyright owner. If you consider the copyright owner may not have granted permission for the image to be made available on the website, you should not use it.

Back to top | Permalink

What permissions do I need to use a particular font or typeface?

1.6.2008

There have been a number of cases in which designs for individual letters have been held to be “artistic works” for the purposes of copyright. Copyright in many popular typefaces has, however, expired, where these were created and used by people who died more than fifty years ago.

 

Nonetheless, many popular typeface designs are still in copyright. Therefore, if you are drawing lettering by hand in a particular font (or recreating the font style in, for example, a computerised drawing program), it is likely that you will need permission from the relevant copyright owner.

 

If you are using a mechanical device such as a typewriter to create a document in a particular font, it is likely that you have an implied licence to reproduce the typeface in the documents you are generating.

 

However, if you are generating documents or designs using a computer, the issue is likely to be whether you are licensed to use the software that includes and generates the particular typeface. In these cases, check the licence agreement which accompanies the software, or any statements from the relevant company (for example, on its website, or in the “readme” files that often accompany software). These are likely to state what you can do with the software and the font/s. If you are outsourcing the printing of documents, it may be that the printing company will need its own licensed copy of the relevant font software.

Back to top | Permalink

Is the layout for a book, brochure or magazine protected by copyright?

3.6.2009

The typesetting and typographical arrangement of an entire book, brochure or magazine will be protected as a “published edition”. This is a narrow and short copyright (only lasting for 25 years), owned by the publisher.

 

It is not clear, however, whether the layout for a specific publication – or a general template for a layout – may also be protected as an “artistic work”. We are not aware of any Australian cases on this, and there are conflicting British cases. If a layout or template were protected, the first owner of this copyright would usually not be the publisher, but the relevant graphic artist or his or her employer.

 

Generally, a claim that a particular layout is protected by copyright as an artistic work is likely to have a greater chance of success in relation to a more elaborate layout (such as in a magazine) than in relation to the typical layout of a book. As always, the best way to deal with any possible conflicts over the downstream use of what you create for clients is to make sure your client agreement specifically addresses who will own rights, and what each party’s entitlements will be in relation to a layout or template.

Back to top | Permalink