<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
         xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/recentnews/RSS">
  <title>Recent news items</title>
  <link>http://www.copyright.org.au</link>
  
  <description>
    
       Site News
       
  </description>
  
  
  
            <syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
            <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
            <syn:updateBase>2006-01-09T21:50:27Z</syn:updateBase>
        
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/logo.jpg"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2010-cases/larrikin-music-publishing-v-emi-songs-australia"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2010-cases/roadshow-films-pty-ltd-v-iinet-limited"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/legislation-news/2009-legislation-news/u30105"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/inquiries-news/2009-inquiries-news/u30083"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u30072"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/announcements-news/2009-announcements-news/u30027"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u30018"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u30019"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u30017"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/announcements-news/2009-announcements-news/u30003"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u29956"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u29906"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u29905"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/inquiries-news/2009-inquiries-news/u29860"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u29857"/>
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>

    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2010-cases/larrikin-music-publishing-v-emi-songs-australia">        <title>Decision on Larrikin Records vs. EMI</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2010-cases/larrikin-music-publishing-v-emi-songs-australia</link>        <description>The Federal Court of Australia found in favour of Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd (Larrikin) in a decision handed down by Jacobson J. The matter centred around whether Australian band Men at Work¹s song Down Under contained a flute solo that infringed the copyright of the Australian children¹s song Kookaburra (sits in the old gum tree), published by Larrikin.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2010-02-05T04:16:24Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2010-cases/roadshow-films-pty-ltd-v-iinet-limited">        <title>Federal Court decision on iiNet vs. film and television studios</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2010-cases/roadshow-films-pty-ltd-v-iinet-limited</link>        <description>The Federal Court has found in favour of internet service provider (ISP) iiNet Limited (iiNet) in a matter brought against it by several major film and television studios and also involving the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT).</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2010-02-05T04:15:38Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/legislation-news/2009-legislation-news/u30105">        <title>Personal Property Securities legislation receives Royal Assent</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/legislation-news/2009-legislation-news/u30105</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-12-23T01:45:33Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/inquiries-news/2009-inquiries-news/u30083">        <title>Government 2.0 taskforce draft report released for comment</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/inquiries-news/2009-inquiries-news/u30083</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-12-14T22:04:48Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u30072">        <title>IIA denied leave to appear as amicus curiae in iiNet case</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u30072</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-11-30T03:06:59Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/announcements-news/2009-announcements-news/u30027">        <title>Senate passes Resale Royalty Bill and Personal Property Securities Bill without amendments</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/announcements-news/2009-announcements-news/u30027</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-11-26T05:38:38Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u30018">        <title>Ugg boots in court (again)</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u30018</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-11-19T06:45:12Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u30019">        <title>Amended settlement filed in Authors Guild v Google</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u30019</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-12-10T02:16:24Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u30017">        <title>Federal Court dismisses Vawdrey trailer appeal</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u30017</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-11-16T00:10:14Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/announcements-news/2009-announcements-news/u30003">        <title>Book publishers win campaign to retain territorial copyright</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/announcements-news/2009-announcements-news/u30003</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-11-12T05:07:10Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u29956">        <title>First major Pay TV transmission case decided by Federal Court </title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u29956</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-11-12T05:11:09Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u29906">        <title>Intelmail Explorenet Pty Ltd and Heros Dilanchian v Avo Vardanian and Controlmech Pty Ltd (No 2)</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u29906</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-09-22T06:50:51Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u29905">        <title>Appeal dismissed: University of Western Australia v Gray</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u29905</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-09-08T02:26:31Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/inquiries-news/2009-inquiries-news/u29860">        <title>Government 2.0 Taskforce seeks responses to Issues Paper</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/inquiries-news/2009-inquiries-news/u29860</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-08-16T01:40:20Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u29857">        <title>Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited</title>        <link>http://www.copyright.org.au/news/news_items/cases-news/2009-cases/u29857</link>        <description></description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-08-03T05:36:08Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Item</dc:type>    </item>




</rdf:RDF>
